A COMPARISON ANT. PETROF AND MISTRAL

Authors

  • Ondřej Jirásek
  • Tomáš Peloušek

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36336/akustika20244737

Keywords:

acoustic, anechoic chamber, Ant. Petrof, aliquots, bass, braces, cumulative line spectrum (CLS), decay time matrix, English mechanics, fast Fourier transform, grand piano, hammer velocity, harmonics, harmonic spectrum, keys, measurement, mid, Mistral, note, Petrof, play-bench, partials, relative sound level matrix, short time Fourier transform, spectral analysis, soundboard, periodogram, spectogram, spectrum, string, spectral centroid matrix, Shigeru Kawai, Steinway, timbre, treble, vibration, voicing, yamaha

Abstract

This paper describes the measurement of two Petrof grand pianos: Ant. Petrof and Mistral. The goal was to compare their parameters, i.e. harmonic spectra, decay time, relative sound level, spectral centroids, and cumulative line spectra (CLS). The complete range of 88 tones (keys) was measured in the anechoic chamber of Petrof, where we used a play-bench for precision. The obtained data were analysed and put into comparison. This analysis was supplemented by a comparison of selected samples (keys A2 and A4 played in forte and piano dynamics) to samples of three competing brands (Shigeru Kawai, Yamaha, Steinway).

Downloads

Published

2024-11-21

How to Cite

Jirásek, O., & Peloušek, T. (2024). A COMPARISON ANT. PETROF AND MISTRAL. Journal Akustika, 47(47), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.36336/akustika20244737

Issue

Section

TEMPLATE