SOUND FREQUENCY SPECTRUM VERSUS LENGTH OF CLOSED ORGAN PIPES

Authors

  • Andrej Štafura Author
  • Ján Poničan Slovak Author
  • Štefan Nagy Author
  • Ľubomír Pavlík Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36336/akustika20254821

Keywords:

Organ pipes, wood, sound, tuning, restoration

Abstract

In the history of the pipe organ, we can observe different pitch standards, which are connected to the musical aesthetics of the time or the intentions of the builder. These differences are often noted based on provenance, meaning the origin or location where the organ was made. Each historical period had its own aesthetic and technical requirements, which were reflected in the tuning and pitch of the organ. The retuning of organs occurred mainly at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, with a change in the intonation of these instruments. In the territory of Slovakia, this change primarily involved a shift from the original pitch of approximately 412 Hz to 440 Hz. This change, of course, affected mainly older instruments and was part of a broader process known as the romanticization of organs. This process marked a departure from the original sound ideal of the Baroque period and a transition to the romantic sound ideal. Study examines the limitations of tuning height for wooden closed organ pipes, specifically the Copula stop, which has undergone significant retuning and intonation adjustments in the past. By using a gradual retuning method, the research analyses the sound's frequency spectrum to determine the optimal tuning range. The results show that significant changes in tuning height can lead to substantial degradation in sound quality. The research emphasizes that ill-considered restorative modifications to the air column length of these organ pipes lead to undesirable and permanent changes in the instrument's sound characteristics.

VOLUME 48

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11

Issue

Section

TEMPLATE

How to Cite

SOUND FREQUENCY SPECTRUM VERSUS LENGTH OF CLOSED ORGAN PIPES. (2025). Journal Akustika, 48(48), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.36336/akustika20254821